Advancing Safety, Dignity, and Equitable Correctional Reform for Incarcerated Women
As policymakers and advocates committed to the principles of justice, due process, and the inherent dignity of all individuals, we affirm that meaningful correctional reform must include legally sound and gender-responsive policies for incarcerated women. This is especially urgent for populations including pregnant defendants, primary caregivers, first-time offenders, and survivors of abuse.
The U.S. correctional system was historically designed around male populations. Yet today, women represent the fastest-growing demographic in U.S. incarceration—often for nonviolent, low-level offenses. Existing infrastructure and legal frameworks have failed to account for their distinct needs, thereby compromising safety, rehabilitation, and public trust.
We do not advocate for leniency; we advocate for targeted reforms that align with constitutional protections, promote public safety, and honor the values of accountability and rehabilitation.

The Legal Imperative for Reform
A significant percentage of incarcerated women are charged with nonviolent offenses—many connected to substance use, economic instability, or their own histories as victims of trauma or abuse. Data further indicate that a majority are mothers and often the primary caregivers of minor children.
However, the prevailing correctional environment does not adequately serve these populations. In many institutions, women are:
- Denied access to gender-specific physical and behavioral health care;
- Housed in facilities that lack legal and rehabilitative services oriented toward reentry and family reunification;
- Placed in conditions that pose heightened risks of harassment, trauma, and abuse, contrary to the Eighth Amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishment.
These systemic deficiencies fail not only the individuals incarcerated but also their children, communities, and the broader goals of our justice system.

Pregnant Inmates and Pre-Trial Detainees: The Need for Alternative Custody Solutions
We assert that pregnant women—particularly those who are first-time or nonviolent defendants—should not be subject to incarceration in general population prison settings absent a clear and compelling risk to public safety.
To ensure lawful, humane treatment, we support legislative action that would:
- Establish specialized residential or community-based facilities for pregnant defendants awaiting trial or sentencing, ensuring continuity of medical care and minimizing pretrial detention’s collateral consequences;
- Implement mother-infant units within correctional environments that allow postpartum mothers to remain with their newborns, subject to public safety assessments, while participating in structured parenting and rehabilitative programs;
- Prohibit the shackling or restraint of pregnant individuals during labor, delivery, or postnatal recovery, except in narrowly defined circumstances consistent with constitutional and international human rights standards.
Research shows that enabling mother-child bonding during the earliest stages of life significantly reduces recidivism, improves developmental outcomes, and promotes family stability—advancing long-term public interest.

Policy Priorities for Women-Centered Correctional Reform
To promote lawful, safe, and rehabilitative correctional environments for female inmates, we advocate for the following policy objectives:
- Enhanced statutory protections against sexual abuse and misconduct in custody, including mandatory reporting structures, third-party oversight mechanisms, and staff accountability measures consistent with the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA);
- Expansion of trauma-informed, gender-responsive, and faith-based rehabilitation programs, tailored to the psychosocial and relational needs of incarcerated women;
- Improved access to prenatal, postnatal, and mental health care in accordance with prevailing clinical and ethical standards;
- Alternative sentencing models and diversionary programs for nonviolent women offenders, particularly those with dependent children, grounded in restorative justice principles;
- Comprehensive reentry planning and services, including access to legal support, education, job training, and transitional housing—key to reducing recidivism and ensuring long-term reintegration.

Toward a Constitutionally Sound and Just Correctional Framework
A correctional system that fails to address the gender-specific realities of its population cannot fulfill its constitutional and rehabilitative mandate. Protecting the rights and safety of incarcerated women is not ancillary to justice—it is foundational to it.
When we uphold the rights of the most vulnerable, we reinforce public safety. When we reduce institutional harm, we reduce future criminal behavior. And when we pursue reform grounded in law, accountability, and compassion, we strengthen the legitimacy of our justice system.

The Federal Correctional Institution in Dublin, California (FCI Dublin), a low-security federal prison for female inmates, was permanently closed in December 2024 following extensive reports of systemic sexual abuse and misconduct by staff members. Established in 1974 and designated exclusively for female offenders in 2012, FCI Dublin was one of five federal women’s prisons in the United States. Federal Defender+12Wikipedia+12Los Angeles Times+12
Systemic Abuse and Legal Actions
Investigations revealed a pervasive culture of sexual misconduct at FCI Dublin, leading to the facility being infamously dubbed the “rape club.” Since 2021, at least eight staff members, including former warden Ray J. Garcia, were charged with sexually abusing inmates; Garcia was convicted in 2022 and sentenced to 70 months in prison. Los Angeles Times+8Wikipedia+8The Guardian+8The Guardian+6AP News+6Wikipedia+6
In response to these abuses, over 100 women filed lawsuits against the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), resulting in a historic settlement in December 2024. The U.S. government agreed to pay nearly $116 million, averaging about $1.1 million per plaintiff, to resolve claims of sexual abuse and mistreatment at FCI Dublin. Pleasanton Weekly+6Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP+6CBS News+6Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP+8AP News+8CBS News+8
Closure and Aftermath
The BOP’s decision to permanently close FCI Dublin was influenced by critical staffing shortages, deteriorating infrastructure, and the high costs associated with necessary repairs. This move was part of a broader effort to address systemic issues within the federal prison system. KTVU FOX 2 San Francisco+12AP News+12Corrections1+12
Following the closure, nearly 500 former FCI Dublin inmates were transferred to other federal prisons across the country. A consent decree was approved to ensure oversight and protections for these individuals, mandating measures such as confidential reporting of abuse, improved medical care, and safeguards against retaliation. The decree also required the BOP director to issue a formal, public acknowledgment to survivors of staff sexual abuse at FCI Dublin. The Guardian+14Los Angeles Times+14Pleasanton Weekly+14AP NewsKTVU FOX 2 San Francisco+9Pleasanton Weekly+9AP News+9
Community Response
In early 2025, proposals to repurpose the closed facility as an immigrant detention center were met with significant public opposition. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered to protest, citing the prison’s troubling history and unsuitability for housing detainees. KTVU FOX 2 San Francisco+2San Francisco Chronicle+2ABC7 San Francisco+2
The closure of FCI Dublin and the subsequent legal settlements underscore the urgent need for systemic reforms within the U.S. federal prison system to prevent such abuses in the future and to uphold the rights and dignity of incarcerated individuals.